Strategic tensions and adaptive equilibrium in family firms: A middle-range theory of sustainable transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63775/0k3daa23Keywords:
Family business transformation, Strategic tensions, Adaptive equilibrium, Organizational configurations, Socioemotional wealthAbstract
Family firms often display a persistent coexistence of recognizable governance stability and highly variable transformation trajectories, yet existing theories explain this pattern only partially. This paper develops a middle-range theory of sustainable transformation by reconceptualizing family firm transformation as movement across equilibrium configurations shaped by persistent strategic tensions rather than progression through linear stages. The theory centers on three tensions (i.e., legacy–professionalization, tradition–innovation, and control–growth) and specifies a causal logic linking persistent tensions, tension gradients, adaptive equilibrium, and movement trajectories. From this logic, the paper derives four equilibrium configurations and explains repositioning across them through succession, institutional change, innovation pressures, and socioemotional wealth, including nonlinear pathways such as oscillation, regression, and leapfrogging. The paper makes three contributions. First, it develops a strategic tension theory of transformation. Second, it explains movement across configurations through equilibrium dynamics and tension gradients. Third, it reframes sustainability as adaptive equilibrium, defined as maintaining viability through repositioning under persistent strategic pressures. Linking tensions, equilibrium, and movement into a unified explanatory framework, the paper offers a conceptually disciplined alternative to linear models of family firm evolution and establishes an agenda for future empirical research.
References
Aguilera, R. V., & Crespí-Cladera, R. (2012). Firm family firms: Current debates of corporate governance in family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3(2), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2012.03.006
Amit, R., Ding, Y., Villalonga, B., & Zhang, H. (2015). The role of institutional development in the prevalence and performance of entrepreneur and family-controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 31, 284–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.01.001
Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 215-376. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.216
Arteaga, R., & Escribá-Esteve, A. (2020). Heterogeneity in family firms: Contextualising the adoption of family governance mechanisms. Journal of Family Business Management, 11(1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-10-2019-0068
Bak, P., & Sneppen, K. (1993). Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Physical Review Letters, 71(24), 4083–4086. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.4083
Basco, R., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Advancing family business research through nonlinear modeling. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100457
Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
Berti, M., & Simpson, A. V. (2021). The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review, 46(2), 252–274. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0208
Beverland, M., & Lockshin, L. S. (2001). Organizational life cycles in small New Zealand wineries. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(4), 354-362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0447-2778.00032
Börje, B., & Nordqvist, M. (2020). Family businesses as hybrid organisations. In: Billis, D., & Rochester, C. (Eds.), Handbook on Hybrid Organisations. (pp. 507–521). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785366116.00039
Brenes, E. R., Madrigal, K., & Requena, B. (2011). Corporate governance and family business performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(3), 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.013
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
Brunninge, O., & Melander, A. (2016). The dynamics of path dependence on the individual, organizational and field levels. Management & Organizational History, 11(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2016.1150858
Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00081.x
Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. (2002). Institutional environments and organizational strategies: The rise of family business groups in the ASEAN region. Organization Studies, 23(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840602231001
Chen, J. (2017). The relationship between organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: Does generation involvement matter? Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.04.001
Chrisman, J. J., & Holt, D. T. (2016). Beyond socioemotional wealth: Taking another step toward a theory of the family firm. Management Research Review, 14(3): 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRJIAM-06-2016-0670
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2018). Governance mechanisms and family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717748650
Dau, L. A., Purkayastha, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2020). Who does it best? Family and nonfamily owners and leaders navigating institutional development in emerging markets. Journal of Business Research, 121, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.039
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (2010a). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/259223
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: Lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0017
Dekker, J. C., Lybaert, N., Steijvers, T., Depaire, B., & Mercken, R. (2013). Family firm types based on the professionalization construct. Family Business Review, 26(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512445614
Filser, M., De Massis, A., Gast, J., & Niemand, T. (2018). Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), 609-628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433
Gabriel, A., & Bitsch, V. (2019). Impacts of succession in family business: A systemic approach for understanding dynamic effects in horticultural retail companies in Germany. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(4), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-01-2018-0030
Gaim, M., & Wåhlin, N. (2016). In search of a framing theory of paradox. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0331
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106-137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press.
Levinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934–950. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934
Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run: Lessons in competitive advantage from great family businesses. Harvard Business School Press.
Schad, J., & Bansal, P. (2018). Seeing the forest and the trees: How a systems perspective informs paradox research. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0018
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.44886048
Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.2005.00028.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nawar Muneer J. Algthami, Bala Salisu (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
